Here’s the lowdown on RapidLash:
RapidLash is packaged similarly to a liquid eyeliner with an extremely thin brush. You simply use the wand to swipe the solution across your upper lash line and let the treatment work its magic.
While Latisse relies on bimatoprost to do the growing, RapidLash uses an ingredient with molecular similarities called isopropyl cloprostenate. Because this isn’t classified as a drug, RapidLash doesn’t require a prescription and hence hasn’t been as heavily tested as Latisse (although the company behind RapidLash has done their own testing to a certain extent).
But the big question is, does it work?
Just like with Latisse, it takes a while to see results. Around the fifth week of nightly application, I finally started to notice my lashes were longer, and by the seventh week I had a few that were way longer than the rest.
The results weren’t all that noticeable on my bare, blonde lashes (RapidLash doesn’t make lashes any darker). But with mascara on, my lashes definitely looked longer than they had before I started the treatment, and I was impressed.
However, this doesn’t mean you should go out and buy the next lash growth serum you see at the drugstore. While they may tout lash growing abilities via peptides, plant extracts or other special ingredients, most lash growth serums and mascaras are a scam and simply can’t affect hair growth.
RapidLash is an exception. At around $50 for 3 ml (which lasted about two months) versus $125 for 3 ml from Latisse, it’s a more affordable way to dabble in lash growth.
*It should also be noted that with both products there are potential side effects, such as a temporary darkening along the lash line. While I didn’t experience this, that doesn’t mean you won’t. Consult with your physician if you have concerns.